Friday, December 4, 2020

Critical reflection

Looking back on the trimester, at the start of this module, my goal was to develop my confidence and to overcome my fears in speaking to a large crowd. By the end of this module, I am happy to say that I have achieved my goals with the help of my peers and Professor Brad. 

The oral presentation and pitching session that we had was the first step towards achieving my goals. The constant push from Professor Brad to speak up during tutorial lessons has forced me to step out of my comfort zone and participate in the class more. Not only that, but he has also guided and provided me with proper steps towards creating slides and presenting them in class. During the rehearsal session with my groupmates - Angelo and Jin Yong, I received feedback and constructive criticism from them and Professor Brad about the areas where I was lacking. I believe that receiving peer feedback helped me to better improve myself as it gave me the chance to better grasp presentation skills. This prevented me from making the same mistakes for the final presentation. 

There were also a couple of classmates that stood out during this session and they amazed me because of the amount of confidence and charisma they had shown when presenting to the class, this has inspired me to further improve myself.

Out of all the reports that were done, the one that stood out most for me was writing the readers response. One specific point that made me reflect on the learning process was writing skills. Through Professor Brad’s lessons, I was able to learn how to write a proper review using the seven Cs of communication and about the different APA citations for reference. Further down in university, I will be able to use what I learn during that lesson and input it into different modules when writing and citing for the report. I believe that following this method of style, I will be able to construct a proper report with a proper flow.

One takeaway I have after going through this entire module is that communication is key. Further down university life, I will be working with different people for my projects. Being able to communicate effectively is perhaps the most important of all life skills. It is what enables us to pass information to other people and to understand what is said to me. The ability to communicate effectively plays a large role in resolving conflicts and preventing potential ones from arising. When your group members understand their roles, the roles of others, and the expectations, they can focus more on their work. With effective communication, conflicts are also resolved quickly.

SIE2016 has been a good way to fine-tune my teamwork whilst really improving my presentation skills. These skills will serve me well when writing and presenting future reports.

5/12/20 (FINAL DRAFT) Reader's response

In the article “Top Sustainable Technologies in Green Construction” by ConstructionClimateChallenge (2019) states that green construction “makes buildings more energy-efficient and sustainable”. This article focuses on introducing sustainable construction technologies that enhance the environment. Three main topics that the article is focusing on are the materials, applications, and design. Firstly, the technologies under materials including “cool roofs”, “electrochromic smart glass”, “rammed earth bricks”, “green insulation”, “biodegradable materials”, and “sustainable resource sourcing” suggest that it helps in the reduction of “heat absorption” and the harmful impacts on the environment by using recycled or sustainable raw materials. Applications such as "water efficiency technologies", "sustainable indoor environment technologies", and "solar powers" are intended to conserve resources and discourage the use of substances and materials that cannot be renewed while reducing damaging impacts on the environment. The last point is on design, which includes “low energy house and zero-energy building design”, “self-powered building” and “the use of smart application”. The applications are designed to conserve and produce energy for the building to generate sufficient power. Green construction not only makes buildings more sustainable by using resource-efficient and environmentally friendly processes but also reduces costs for building owners.

While I agree with ConstructionClimateChallenge’s main assertion, despite having accessibility to a wide variety of sustainable construction technologies available today,  I feel that Singapore’s non-residential built industry has not become much more environmentally sustainable because of three reasons: construction practices, weather and space constraints, and cost. Cheong (2018) has stated that "Although Singapore aims to have 80% of buildings to be certified "green" by 2030, as of 2017 only 30% of the buildings were green."

First of all, non- residential construction practices are one such reason why Singapore’s non-residential construction practices have not become much more environmentally sustainable. As stated by Yang (n.d), “Most builders or owners are used to traditional building methods and do not know about the maintenance savings”. In my opinion, builders or owners should adopt and be educated by having a more long-term perspective on the importance of the entirety of the construction processes needing to be environmentally-friendly by using materials and resources that are readily available and are sourced sustainably. Chew (2010) pointed out that “Sustainable construction focuses on the adoption of materials and products in buildings and construction that will consume less natural resources and increase the reusability of such materials and products of the same or similar purpose”. Rising methods of sustainable construction such as usage of green concrete or the implementation of environmental management practices should be adopted. This will help to reduce the use of raw materials and waste produced during the construction process as the entire lifespan of a green building should be optimized to reduce its negative impact on the environment.

Secondly, weather and space constraints are of another concern in the Singapore construction industry. Singapore is in a unique geographical position that makes it hard to utilize alternative energy. As Singapore is a small country with limited land area, it is very hard to implement the use of renewable energy sources such as solar energy and wind power, with solar energy being the only potential source of renewable energy that could make an impact on the energy grid. Alternative sources of renewable energy such as wind turbines in Singapore is impossible because of the amount of wind speed needed to move the turbines and because of the lack of space. Tan(n.d) pointed out that “wind turbines take too much space.

Lastly, the initial cost of being environmentally friendly is seen to be expensive. Yong (2018) stated that although “the return of investment can be recuperated within three to six years within the typical lifespan of a building's mechanical assets”, the initial start-up cost is expensive as these green products have to meet certain strict requirements so as to achieve the required green certification standards. Aside from the initial product cost, consultancy and construction fees have to be taken into account, BCA (2017) has stated that there is “green building recertification fees that recur every 3 years”. Although there are government incentives provided to help accelerate the adoption of environmentally-friendly green building technologies and building design practices, there are still not many building owners that are willing to make the change.

Despite its land constraint, Singapore’s achievement of having 30% of the non-residential building certified “green” is impressive. Singapore has grown into a beautiful garden city, with the effort to be sustainable. I feel that Singapore needs to decrease the usage of non-renewable sources to truly be sustainable.



Reference

Building and Construction Authority. (2017, September). Re-certification of green mark buildings. https://www.bca.gov.sg/GreenMark/others/EB_recert.pdf

Cheong. Y. W. (2018, August 21). The missing piece in Singapore's green building puzzle [Editorial]. Eco-Businesshttps://www.eco-business.com/news/the-missing-piece-in-singapores-green-building-puzzle/

Chew. K. C. (2010, April 30). Singapore's strategies towards sustainable construction. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19373260.2010.491641#:~:text=In%20Singapore's%20context%2C%20Sustainable%20Construction,the%20same%20or%20similar%20purpose

Tan. G (n.d). A case study of Singapore: A garden city that is not so green. https://globuswarwick.com/2018/11/29/a-case-study-of-singapore-a-garden-city-that-is-not-so-green/

Yong. R. A. (2018 January 10). Green buildings cost up to 5 per cent more, but savings 'more than offset' costs. Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/parliament-green-buildings-cost-up-to-5-per-cent-more-but-savings-more-than-offset-costs

Saturday, November 14, 2020

Annotated Summary

Siemens (n.d). The true cost of false fire alarms. https://new.siemens.com/uk/en/company/stories/infrastructure/the-true-cost-of-false-fire-alarms.html

 

This article focuses on the cost of false alarms and the human risk that comes along with it in the United Kingdom (UK). From an evaluation made from Home Office statistics, there were a total of around 226,000 false alarms in the year of 2017/18, which is 41% of the total alarms raised. Whenever a fire alarm is activated, the fire service sends a team out regardless if the alarm is false or not. This meant that there would be lesser available firefighting teams that could attend to genuine fires quickly, which could result in dire outcomes such as fatalities. The article also states that even though 75% of automatically generated fire alarms in the UK are false, efforts are being made to tackle this issue in the form of smart technology such as multi-sensor devices.

The article provides a useful platform for our research project on fire sensors for HDBs, as it gives insight to the potential harm of false alarms as well as their would-be solutions, something we hope to achieve in our research project. From a test that was conducted between a traditional smoke detector and an intelligent device, the report found that the intelligent devices were more discerning and reacted slower to false stimuli without compromising the speed of reaction to real fire threats therefore reducing potential fatalities. While the research focuses on the unnecessary call-outs made by the huge number of commercial and industrial premises that are fitted with automatic alarm detection systems in the UK, the article still provides useful information and statistics on the potential risk of false alarms as well as technologies to tackle that issue, which is a relevant and useful aspect of our research project.


Thursday, October 8, 2020

Draft 2: Reader's Response

In the article, “Top Sustainable Technologies in Green Construction” by ConstructionClimateChallenge (2019) claims that green construction “makes buildings more energy-efficient and sustainable”. This article focuses on introducing sustainable construction technologies that enhance the environment. Three main topics that we are focusing on are the materials, applications, and design. Firstly, the technologies under materials: “Cool roofs”, “Electrochromic smart glass”, “Rammed earth bricks”, “Green insulation”, “Biodegradable materials”, and “Sustainable resource sourcing” suggest that it helps in the reduction of “heat absorption” and the harmful impacts on the environment by using recycled or sustainable raw materials. Secondly, applications which are “Water efficiency technologies”, “Sustainable indoor environment technologies”, and “Solar powers”. These applications intend to conserve resources and discourage the use of substances and materials that cannot be renewed while reducing damaging impacts on the environment. The last point is on design which includes “Low energy house and Zero-energy building design”, “Self-powered building” and “The use of smart application”. They are designed to conserve and produce energy for the building to generate sufficient power. Green construction not only makes buildings more sustainable by using resource-efficient and environmentally friendly processes but also reduces costs for building owners.

While I agree with ConstructionClimateChallenge’s main assertion, despite having accessibility to a wide variety of sustainable construction technologies available today,  I feel that Singapore’s built industry has not become much more environmentally sustainable because of three reasons, construction practices, weather and space constraints, and cost. Although Singapore aims to have 80% a building to be certified by 2030, as of 2017 only 30% of the buildings WERE green.

First of all, non- residential construction practices are one such reason why Singapore’s non-residential construction practices have not become much more environmentally sustainable. As stated by Yang (n.d) “Most builders or owners are used to traditional building methods and do not know about the maintenance savings”. In my opinion, builders or owners should adopt and be educated on the importance of the entirety of the construction processes' need to be environmentally-friendly by using materials and resources that are readily available and are sourced sustainably. As stated by Chew (2010) “Sustainable construction focuses on the adoption of materials and products in buildings and construction that will consume less natural resources and increase the reusability of such materials and products of the same or similar purpose”. Rising methods of sustainable construction such as usage of green concrete or the implementation of Environmental Management Practices for the construction companies should be adopted to reduce the use of raw materials and the waste produced during the construction process, as the entire lifespan of green, the building should be optimized to reduce its negative impact on the environment.

Secondly, weather and space constraints are another concern regarding being more environmentally sustainable. Singapore is in a unique geographical position that makes it hard to utilize alternative energy. As Singapore is a small country with limited land area, it is very hard to implement the use of renewable energy sources such as solar energy and wind power, with solar energy being the only potential source of renewable energy that could make an impact on the energy grid. Alternative sources of renewable energy such as wind turbines in Singapore is impossible because of the amount of wind speed needed to move the turbines and because of the lack of space; as pointed by Tan(n.d), “wind turbines take too much space, casting of shadow flicker” that can cause headaches.

Lastly, the initial cost of being environmentally friendly is seen to be expensive. As describe by Yong (2018) although “the return of investment can be recuperated within three to six years within the typical lifespan of a building's mechanical assets”, the initial start-up cost is expensive as these green products have to meet certain strict requirements so as to achieve the required green certification standards. Aside from the initial product cost, consultancy and construction fees have to be taken into account, as stated by BCA (2017) there is “green building recertification fees that recur every 3 years”. Although there are government incentives provided to help accelerate the adoption of environmentally-friendly green building technologies and building design practices, there are still not many building owners that are willing to make the change.

Although Singapore is small with little land, to make it this far environmentally is impressive. Singapore has grown into a beautiful garden city, with the government making an effort to be sustainable, I feel that Singapore needs to decrease the usage of non-renewable sources to truly be sustainable.

 

 

Reference:

Cheong. Y. W. (2018, August 21). The missing piece in Singapore's green building puzzle [Editorial]. Eco-Business. https://www.eco-business.com/news/the-missing-piece-in-singapores-green-building-puzzle/

K. C. Chew. (2010, April 30). Singapore's strategies towards sustainable construction. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19373260.2010.491641#:~:text=In%20Singapore's%20context%2C%20Sustainable%20Construction,the%20same%20or%20similar%20purpose

G. Tan. (n.d). A case study of Singapore: A garden city that is not so green. https://globuswarwick.com/2018/11/29/a-case-study-of-singapore-a-garden-city-that-is-not-so-green/

Building and Construction Authority. (2017, September). Re-certification of green mark buildings. https://www.bca.gov.sg/GreenMark/others/EB_recert.pdf

R. A. Yong (2018 January 10). Green buildings cost up to 5 per cent more, but savings 'more than offset' costs. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/parliament-green-buildings-cost-up-to-5-per-cent-more-but-savings-more-than-offset-costs

Monday, September 28, 2020

Draft 1: Summary

The article, “Top Sustainable Technologies in Green Construction”, ConstructionClimateChallenge (2019) claims that green construction “makes buildings more energy-efficient and sustainable”. This article focuses on introducing sustainable construction technologies to enhance green construction. There are three main topics which are materials, applications, and design. Firstly, the technologies under materials: “Cool roofs”, “Electrochromic smart glass”, “Rammed earth bricks”, “Green insulation”, “Biodegradable materials”, and “Sustainable resource sourcing” suggests that it helps in the reduction of absorption of heat and the harmful impacts on the environment by using recycled or sustainable raw materials. Secondly, the applications which are “Water efficiency technologies”, “Sustainable indoor environment technologies”, and “Solar powers”. These applications intend to conserve resources and discourage the use of substances and materials that cannot be renewed while reducing damaging impacts on the environment. The last point is design which includes “Low energy house and Zero-energy building design”, “Self-powered building” and “The use of smart application”. They are designed to conserve and produce energy for the building to generate sufficient power. Green construction not only makes buildings more sustainable by using resource-efficient and environmentally process but also reduces costs for building owners.


Reference:
ConstructionClimateChallenge.com (2019). Top Sustainable Technologies in Green Construction.

Retrieved from:
https://constructionclimatechallenge.com/2019/02/19/top-sustainable-technologies-in-green-construction/

Revised as of 04/10/20 2351hr

Wednesday, September 16, 2020

Submission 1: Formal letter

Subject: Self-introduction

Dear Prof Blackstone,

I would like to take this opportunity to introduce myself to you. My name is Chan Wei Ying and I am a year 1 engineering student in your effective communication module.

I have recently graduated from Temasek Polytechnic with a diploma in green building and sustainability. Before the start of university, I extended my internship with a company under the government and institution department where I was tasked to aid various schools in achieving their Green Mark certification. After working with the company, I developed an interest in this line of work; it is interesting to see how something small such as changing the light bulbs can make a building more efficient, hence I decided to further my studies in the sustainable infrastructure engineering (building services) program offered by SIT.

My communication strength is that I have the disposition to be friendly. I believe that I have a warm personality that makes me approachable as I respect people’s feelings, ideas, and beliefs.

My greatest weakness is my public speaking skills. Public speaking is a huge challenge for me. I get incredibly nervous when I am tasked to speak in front of a large and unfamiliar crowd. However, I do not get nervous when presenting in smaller groups.

My goal for this module is to be able to develop confidence in speaking to a large crowd and overcome my fear of public speaking as I have realized that this will hinder my progress as an individual and in the future when I enter the workforce.

 

Best Regards,

Chan Wei Ying


Revised as of 03/10/20 2048hr


Thursday, September 10, 2020

 “Employers identify communication as one of the basic competencies every

graduate should have, asserting that the ability to communicate is valuable for

obtaining employment and maintaining successful job performance.”

Sherwyn Morreale, Michael Osborn & Judy Pearson, Professors of Communication (2000)


What are my views on it?

With the ability to communicate well, good communication skills enables others to understand information more accurately and quickly. The main importance for good workplace communication is the ability to translate their ideas properly. With that, employees will be able to meet the employer's needs by receiving their feedback and making necessary changes.

Critical reflection

Looking back on the trimester, at the start of this module, my goal was to develop my confidence and to overcome my fears in speaking to a l...